Cliomuse.com
Where history and movies meet
Cliomuse.com
  • Featured Movies
    • 12 Years a Slave (2013)
    • 1941 (Spielberg) >
      • 1941: Part 2
    • Affair of the Necklace
    • Alice's Restaurant: best of the American counterculture movies?
    • Army of Crime
    • Army of Shadows
    • The Artist >
      • 'The Artist':2
    • Anthropoid: the Assassination of Reinhard Heydrich, 1942: Four Very Different Movies >
      • Hangmen Also Die: Hollywood meets emigres from Nazi Germany
    • Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman
    • Battle of the Rails ( La bataille du rail)
    • Belle (2014)
    • Bhowani Junction
    • Blackboard Jungle >
      • Blackboard Jungle Pt.2
    • Carry On Up the Khyber
    • Charlie Wilson's War
    • The City Across the River
    • The Counterculture : best movies about the American counterculture era
    • Custer - two contrasting movie portrayals: "They Died With Their Boots On" and "Little Big Man" >
      • They Died With Their Boots On
      • Stalin and the Movies >
        • Stalin, Disney, Eisenstein, & Ivan the Terrible
      • Death of Stalin
      • Little Big Man (1970)
    • Dark Knight Rises >
      • Dark Knight Rises Pt.2
    • The Deceivers
    • Diplomacy / Diplomatie (2014) movie
    • Dunkirk: Christopher Nolan's epic movie
    • El Cid
    • The Enigma Machine : four movies about the Enigma machine
    • Generation War >
      • Generation War: Jazz and the Swing Kids
      • Generation War: German women and the war
    • The Great Gatsby On the Big Screen
    • Gunga Din
    • A Hard Day's Night: Influences on the Movie
    • Hemingway & Gellhorn >
      • Martha Gellhorn >
        • Women war correspondents
    • Hyde Park on Hudson
    • The Imitation Game (2014) >
      • The Imitation Game Part 2: the truth about Turing and the Bletchley 'Bombe'. >
        • The Imitation Game: Turing, Bletchley and the Colossus >
          • Imitation Game: Turing, Bletchley Park and the Soviet spy
    • The Inner Circle (1991)
    • Is Paris Burning? >
      • Is Paris Burning? General von Choltitz
    • KIng of the Khyber Rifles
    • Kim
    • Léon Morin, Priest
    • Les Miserables (2012) >
      • Les Miserables in Movies: Fantine the grisette >
        • Les Miserables 3: guide to some historical references
    • "Les Misérables": Claude Lelouch updates a classic
    • Lives of a Bengal Lancer (1935)
    • The Long Duel
    • Looking at Lincoln - Spielberg's "Lincoln" & its predecessors and influences >
      • Spielberg's Lincoln
      • Abraham Lincoln: D.W. Griffith's version
      • Young Mr. Lincoln (1939)
      • Abe Lincoln in Illinois
    • Mandingo (1975) Dir: Richard Fleischer
    • The Man Who Would Be King
    • Marie Antoinette (2006)
    • Marie-Antoinette / Shadow of the Guillotine
    • Farewell, My Queen
    • Marie Antoinette (1938) >
      • Marie Antoinette (1938) Pt.2
    • Mayerling
    • Midnight in Paris >
      • Midnight in Paris:2 >
        • Midnight in Paris:3
    • The Monuments Men (2014) Dir: George Clooney
    • North West Frontier / Flame Over India
    • La Nuit de Varennes - a post-modern take on a key episode in the French Revolution
    • Le Pere Tranquille (The Quiet Father) 1946
    • Peterloo: MIke Leigh's New Movie >
      • Peterloo2
    • Pompeii in the movies >
      • Pompeii (2014) Paul W.S. Anderson director
    • Rebel Without a Cause
    • Ridicule
    • Scott Fitzgerald Goes to Hollywood
    • Sergeant Rutledge
    • Silence of the Sea
    • Swing Kids (1993)
    • The Train
    • Train to Pakistan
    • Stranglers of Bombay
    • Tonka
    • Tulip Fever
    • Viceroy's House
    • The Vikings
    • Vietnam Westerns: western movies and the Vietnam war
    • Wee Willie Winkie
    • The Wind and the Lion
    • Woman in Gold >
      • Woman in Gold Pt.2: the Vienna Scene in early 20th Century Vienna
    • Un village française: French TV series
    • Waterloo: the movie about Napoleon's final battle
    • Zabriskie Point
  • Places
    • Settings: the North West Frontier
    • Movies Set in the North-West Frontier >
      • Thuggees
    • Movies Set in Paris and Versailles
  • Events
    • Events That Inspired Movies 2
    • French Resistance and Collaboration in World War II: Selected Movies
  • People
    • People Part 2
  • Music
    • Rock Around the Clock
    • Don't Knock the Rock
    • The Girl Can't Help It >
      • Pt2:The Girl Can't Help It
  • Free State of Jones
  • Great Wall (2017)
  • Rogue One & World War 2
  • Hollywood and anti-Americanism in a small country: Amercan movies & their critics in New Zealand 1916 - 1956
    • New Zealanders' Love of Movies 1900s-1956
    • Campaign against Hollywood movies in New Zealand
    • Campaign against HollywoodPt 2
  • Hollywood versus Pinewood Pt2
  • New Zealanders and Movies: the Enigmatic Gordon Mirams: film critic, film censor and public intellectual
  • Aryan Papers: Stanley Kubrick's Proposed Movie

Waterloo
(Dir: Sergei Bondarchuk, 1970)

Picture
"Waterloo was such a silly film" - Stanley Kubrick.
Director Sergie Bondarchuk's epic movie about Napoleon's final battle will be forever doomed to be looked at askance because of its unfortunate and unintended  impact on Stanley Kubrick, one of the twentieth century's cinematic geniuses. Kubrick had long intended to make a grand movie about Napoleon and had spent at least four years working on a screenplay and drawing thousands of pages on notes and information ranging from casting, costumes, and  battles,  to personalities,  locations,  art,  and music. But Waterloo - a well-intentioned film with excellent set pieces, its many battle scenes directed with Bondarchuk's customary flair - was poorly received by the critics of the time. The New York Times, for example, condemned it as "a very bad film" directed wih the "subdued refinement of a sledgehammer." Roger Ebert complained that the director was "so overwhelmed  by the thousands of Russian cavalry troops he's been given to play with, and by his $25 million budget, and by-his obsession for aerial photography, that his leading characters turn out scarcely more human than his extras. "
Even  worse, Waterloo was a financial flop. Kubrick found that his dream project was now unable to obtain the studio and financial backing it needed. He unsuccessfully tried for several years to get that backing. So what  has been called "the greatest movie never made" was eventually  dropped from Kubrick's list of projects.

Picture
Preliminary research shooting.
Picture
Kubrick set out entire illustrated notebooks of research about Napoleon.
Picture
Draft of early Kubrick proposal for Napoleon movie.
Picture
Sergei Bondarchuk directing "Waterloo".
Picture
The director's version of Tolstoy's "War and Peace" was much more warmly received than "Waterloo". It won an Oscar for Best Foreign Language Movie.
Picture
Bondarchuk not only directed "War and Peace" - he also played the pivotal role of Pierre, very effectively.
The commercial and (in America) the critical failure of Waterloo was a first for director Sergei Bondarchuk. For years he had been Russia's most acclaimed director. The success of his massive seven-hour long cinematic version of War and Peace had brought him international acclaim and won the 1969 Academy Award for best Foreign Language film. He was also applauded for his performance as Pierre Bezukhov.
War and Peace remains the most expensive movie ever made: about $US 830 million. It took seven years to make, used the services of tens of thousands of Red Army soldiers, more than  two thousand cavalrymen, employed hundreds of professional actors.The sequence showing the battle of Borodino remains the longest battle scene ever made.
Bondarchuk knew something about both war and acting. Born in the Ukraine in 1920, his youthful interest in the stage led him to study drama at Rostov until the German invasion of Russia in 1941. He  spent the next four years fighting for the Red Army. After the war he resumed his acting studies and soon became one of the USSR's best young screen actors. In 1959 he directed his first film, Fate of a Man, a World War 2 drama that was widely praised in Russia and Europe. This success enabled Bondarchuk to attempt the colossal task of translating Tolstoy's epic novel to the screen.
Unfortunately the international success of War and Peace had unfortunate politcal repercussions for Bondarchuk. Brezhnev's Soviet government "invited" him to join the Communist Party. To refse would have meant the end of his days as a director and actor. (It also meant he could use the manpower and resources of the Russian army to make  Waterloo).He was soon "elected" Chairman of the Union of Soviet Filmmakers and consequently his talents were wasted on making some movies that refelected Soviet propaganda rather than his artistic talents. It wasn't until two decades later that he was able to exercise some freedom of choice by making  a movie of the Russian novel And Quiet Flows the Don. But a bitter legal dispute between director and producers meant that the movie was never completed before Bondarchuk's death.
Below: scenes from Bondarchuk's War and Peace
Waterloo: the Movie and Its Problems
With the benefit of hindsight, it's easy to see why Bondarchuk's epic was doomed to critical and commercial failure (as well as bearing the blame for Kubrick's inability to finance his planned Napoleon masterpiece). Movie critics always love to mock excess, and Waterloo's publicity about the movie's huge costs and massive number of extras seemed to invite skepticism. Then there's the question of casting. Neither Rod Steiger (Napoleon) nor Christopher Plummer (Wellington) were exactly box office magnets. Steiger portrays Napoleon as surly, rather ponderous, constantly complaining. He's hardly the charismatic figure of Napoleon legend, although in fact at this stage of his career Bonaparte was indeed a grumpy, stout, short-tempered man whose military (and physical) powers were declining. But to focus a long  movie around such a figure is risky. Plummer's portrayal of Wellington is livelier and much more entertaining, capturing the man's sardonic, cool, calculating personality leavened with occasional cutting humour. But the rivalry  between the two soldiers is hardly dynamic on the screen.
The movie's subject-matter is another big problem. It's essentially a couple of hours of an early nineteenth century European battle - a crucial, historically very significant battle, but it's still a conflict involving people, strategies, policies, military tactics, locations, uniforms and weapons that by 1970 were  virtually unknown by most moviegoers. The movie assumes that  its audiences will know about, and be interested in,  the Napoleonic wars, Wellington and Bonaparte, and the significance of the battle itself.  Furthermore, there are no interesting back-stories, or romantic sub-plots as in War and Peace.  And the movie was picked to death by finicky perfectionists who objected to such details as the fashionable colour of bridal gowns in 1815, the civilian clothes Picton wore to battle, the slope of a strategic valley,  authenticity of weapons, breeds of horses, formation of infantry squares etc etc. And the movie's script is rather wooden and conventional.
Picture
Location of the battlefield.
Yet the movie has several points in its favour. It manages to include the essential  elements of a complicated battle in which  crucial encounters were occurring sometimes simultaneously and a considerable distance apart. In accordance with recent scholarship Waterloo makes it clear that the Prussian  von Blucher's intervention  at the end of the day of slaughter was the decisive blow on the Emperor's right wing that doomed Napoleon's armies. And even if Steiger's portrayal of Napoleon is rather dour and plodding, that is how Napoleon appeared at Waterloo: devoid of his customary military genius and inspiration. The movie also provides some insight into the battlefield carnage. As many as 31 000 Frenchmen were killed or wounded; Wellington and his Prussian ally Blucher lost a total of about 24 000 men. Even the confused and brutal hand-to-hand struggles around the two amazingly strong farmhouses at  Hougoument and La Haie Sainte are given the significance they deserve.
But above all Bondarchuk's movie succeeds primarily as sheer enjoyable and exciting battlefield spectacle, especially as viewed in its original cinematic widescreen release. The panoramic and aerial shots of thousands of men,  horses and artillery manoeuvring almost balletically is very impressive, as is Bondarchuk's depiction of close-quarter combat. The images below indicate how impressive Waterloo was as a big-screen spectacle .
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.